You are indeed "WAY off base."
First, a quote from your post.
" Are you sitting there trying to tell me that math "Couldent" have existied untill someone figured it out?"
Now, a quote from my previous one, with emphasis added.
"I don't suggest that 1+1 did not equal 2, but rather that neither 1 nor 2 could exist without someone to come up with them,
or at the very least an object and another object to combine to create two objects."
You suggested that, in a universe devoid of all physical things 1+1=2 (since the popular view is that God created the physical universe, I assumed that mathematics existing before God implied that). I am saying that I don't believe 2 could exist before the was
anything for there to be two of.
Of course "air" (assuming you refer to Earth's atmosphere) existed as soon as Earth had an atmosphere. Air is not abstract. I can breathe it, I can measure it, and I can choose to breathe helium instead to make my voice sound funny.
"Math is not a psyical form, or even an abstract idea."
Then what is it? What would you describe it as, besides a formal system?
"Shure its a Idea, only because we cant give it psyical form."
I have no idea what you're saying here, although it is an interesting illustration of the migratory patterns of the letter "h."
And now, just to be contrary, I will give an indisputable example of when 1+1 does NOT equal 2.
In base 2, 1 + 1 = 10.
-White Knight <p>
Behold! Sig figs!</p>