Page 1 of 1

Little dilemma on chi.

Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 3:20 pm
by Divinegon2130
All right, I've been trying to help someone with their PhilSys character sheet, and it seems I've hit a bad snag.

The snag in question is the concept of chi (if my Japanese is correct, that means "spirit"), which refers to spirit energy.

In order to clarify this snag a bit, I'm going to bring up two character sheets with differing views on this.

[url=http://pub30.ezboard.com/brpgww60462.showUserPublicProfile?gid=divinegon2130>Divinegon2130</A]&nbsp; Image at: 4/22/03 3:31:20 pm
[/i]

Re.: Something that's been baffling me in PhilSys currently.

Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 3:31 pm
by Mechanisto
If one kind of Chi uses strength and the other uses magic, then they are completely different species of Chi. Sounds like how Psychic powers are handled as spells; you could perform Telekenesis any number of ways, with Psychic powers and/or magic.

Do we need a difference between Chi Magic, and innate Chi powers?

<p>---
You travel from system to system in the ships you create, colonizing worlds and creating new technologies. These are things that every sensible person wants to do. </p>

Re: Re.: Something that's been baffling me in PhilSys curren

Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 3:46 pm
by Skull Dragon 2
Like somebody explained to me once for Two-Handed Weapon Fighting, I guess it depends on how they learned it. To use a D&D reference, wizards and sorcerers cast the same spells. But wizards learn theirs through research and preparation while sorcerers channel inherent magical energy. Somebody can train their chi like a fighter trains with his sword, through practice and execution, or like a mage trains with his magic, through study and preparation. It represents two different approaches to the same general idea. <p>
<div style="text-align:center">"You agree to not use the Service to disseminate off-topic messages on boards promoting any product, service, web site, board or venture, or promote boards on the Service through unsolicited electronic mail messages to third parties." ~ ezboard Terms of Service, Section 6.g
Everybody Takoumori!</div></p>

Re: Re.: Something that's been baffling me in PhilSys curren

Unread postPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 5:28 pm
by Endesu
No. Ki and Chi are roughly the same thing, only different names in different cultures. Ki is Japanese, Chi is Chinese.

There is a separate name for it from India, if I'm not mistaken, though I don't know what that could possibly be. <p>

DB(Z) Manga Shrine -
RPGWW MB - Da Tower -
ADV! MB - Dave Kelly's Purple Pussy</p>

Re: Re.: Something that's been baffling me in PhilSys curren

Unread postPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2003 12:40 pm
by Mechanisto
It's the same training, the same skill; but with different attributes. So why not give Chi techniques a Magic or Agility requirement, depending on their nature? Same skill... different techs. <p>---
You travel from system to system in the ships you create, colonizing worlds and creating new technologies. These are things that every sensible person wants to do. </p>

Unknown

Unread postPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:42 am
by Unknown
(This post is missing and can not be restored)