RPGWW

Tada.

So. Someone just may have solved it. At the very least, the guy who did it (possibly) isn't being a big attention whore about it. <p><center><table border=0><td></td><td>

---

I don't know what the hell this thing is, but the chicks dig it.

---

</td></table></center></p>

He Actually sounds rather satisfied with just solving it. I mean, he doesn't seem to be taking the money or anything. <p>

---

*lurks*<br /><br />Warning: The previous was a work of Chaos. Anything said above was written by a certified nut. Caution is advised<br /><br /> MY head, Dia!!! eVe</p>

I tried to read that little diagram they had...but I couldn't make most of the words out. What was the actually problem?
<p>

---

I am just too damn British.
</p>

Let me guess. Didn't read the article, too many words? <p><span style="font-size:xx-small;">"It's in the air, in the headlines in the newspapers, in the blurry images on television. It is a secret you have yet to grasp, although the first syllable has been spoken in a dream you cannot quite recall." --Unknown Armies</span></p>

This should say a lot:

Quote:

---

Answering the question may help scientists better understand the shape of the universe. Beyond that, it may have no application to everyday life.

---

They admit that only the most brilliant math-minds can appreciate it, so I wouldn't worry about it too much. <p>---
These powerful ships have a tremendous range of fire. Their cannons do enormous amounts of damage to other naval units.</p>

All it says is changing 2D problems to 3D...but that's really not enough detail. Especally as you can change any 2D equation to a 3D one by integrating the square of the equation and multiplying it by pi.
<p>

---

I am just too damn British.
</p>

Zing.

Since Gus is lazy and all. <p><center><table border=0><td></td><td>

---

I don't know what the hell this thing is, but the chicks dig it.

---

</td></table></center></p>Edited by: FlamingDeth at: 1/9/04 5:04 am

I have read that 6 times now.

I have read the [url=http://www.claymath.org/Millennium_Prize_Problems/Poincare_Conjecture/_objects/Official_Problem_Description.pdf>official] too (warning, PDF).

I understand nothing.
<p>

---

I am just too damn British.
</p>

Just the fact that such math problems really exist makes me want to jump off a bridge ;_; <p>

---

<div style="text-align:center">
</div>
<div style="text-align:center">Why Barius has no family reunions.</div></p>

Umm, I thought it was about trying to get a 3 dimensional situation represented in a 2 dimensional light. *shrugs* Meh, whatever. I'll stick with my philosophy.

I actually understand it, and I read about this about 3 months ago in Science News.

Now, if someone solves Riemann's Conjecture, then I'll be really interested. <p>-----
Do not taunt Happy Fun Zemyla.

I think boobs are the lesser of two evils. - Inverse (Pervy)
Dammit, Dan, I'm not dating a damn NPC! - OOC Will (Will Baseton)
Of course! Anything worth doing is worth doing completely wrong! - Travis English

Adventurers! | RPG World World | The Phantom Lord's OT Board mkII | Indie Madnesse | Brotherhood of Elitist Bastards</p>

See, I knew Zem would understand it. Though I'd think you'd be more interested if someone solved P ?= NP. <p><center><table border=0><td></td><td>

---

I don't know what the hell this thing is, but the chicks dig it.

---

</td></table></center></p>Edited by: [url=http://pub30.ezboard.com/brpgww60462.showUserPublicProfile?gid=flamingdeth>FlamingDeth</A] at: 1/9/04 4:30 pm

Math hurts my brain. What is that problem that needs to be solved to figure out how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie-pop?

Wait, I remember this, I think. It's about figuring out whether things have 'holes' in them, right?

~Hatsuma

Yes. Specifically, three-dimensional objects embedded in four-dimensional space. They've proved the cases for all the other dimensions years back. <p>-----
Do not taunt Happy Fun Zemyla.

I think boobs are the lesser of two evils. - Inverse (Pervy)
Dammit, Dan, I'm not dating a damn NPC! - OOC Will (Will Baseton)
Of course! Anything worth doing is worth doing completely wrong! - Travis English

Adventurers! | RPG World World | The Phantom Lord's OT Board mkII | Indie Madnesse | Brotherhood of Elitist Bastards</p>

Yeah, I think I filed that under, "I don't really care IF they prove this". Seemed kind of... pointless.

~Hatsuma!

Speak for yourself. It's unlocking the mysteries of the universe. Plus, it may have applications for cosmology, the shape of the universe, and all that. <p>-----
Do not taunt Happy Fun Zemyla.

I think boobs are the lesser of two evils. - Inverse (Pervy)
Dammit, Dan, I'm not dating a damn NPC! - OOC Will (Will Baseton)
Of course! Anything worth doing is worth doing completely wrong! - Travis English

Adventurers! | RPG World World | The Phantom Lord's OT Board mkII | Indie Madnesse | Brotherhood of Elitist Bastards</p>

That and the article said, in fact, that most people wouldn't care. It is accurate! =D <p><span style="font-size:xx-small;">"It's in the air, in the headlines in the newspapers, in the blurry images on television. It is a secret you have yet to grasp, although the first syllable has been spoken in a dream you cannot quite recall." --Unknown Armies</span></p>

I kinda care ;_;

I just find myself in Gus' boat. I really don't understand the problem. The metaphor that FD linked comes closest to explaining it, I think, but I still dun get what they are saying.

Little help for a math stupid? <p>------------------
Greetings, large black person. Let us not forget to form a team up together and go into the country to inflict the pain of our karate feets on some ass of the giant lizard person.
</p>

I'll go ahead and try. Correct me if I'm wrong.

2-D: Imagine some blob of a shape. Basically, can you draw it with just the one line around the perimiter? If not, then there are one or more 'holes' in the shape. We can find explicit formulae for determining whether or not something has these. Yay!

3-D: Same principle in 3-D. A sphere doesn't have any. A donut does. If you wrap some line around the outside of the donut (around the whole thing, not through the middle hole), then you can't touch every part of it. (If you wrap it through the middle of the donut, then your not really on the outside of it, since you'll never be able to pull the line off of the donut)

And of course we can extrapolate this to any dimension through magic math power.

Alright, now explain it so an Ajil can understand. :/ <p>[--------------------------------------------]
FETUS. I am a FETUS.</p>

Hmm. How 'bout this?

So that's 2d...what about three d? Does it have a hole inside the shape or on the perimeter.
<p>

---

I am just too damn British.
</p>

Donut, Gus. Think of the donuts. <p><span style="font-size:xx-small;">"It's in the air, in the headlines in the newspapers, in the blurry images on television. It is a secret you have yet to grasp, although the first syllable has been spoken in a dream you cannot quite recall." --Unknown Armies</span></p>

~Hatsuma!

Hatsuma's lovely drawings of amoeba and their biologically defective, mutated versions cause me to reward him with a gold star. <p>

---

<div style="text-align:center"></div>

</p>

*totally agrees* <p>-------

E'S QUOTE OF THE WHENEVER:

"I'm here to burn the lollipops."</p>