Well, this is a bit of a sticky wicket, here.
For all my crazy innuendo in chat, and participation in discussions about sex, and generally mild horndoggery, I really think that sex can't be just sex. It's gotta be about the
love. In that respect, it's definately gotta be saved for someone really special.
I'm not sure if I'm a virgin or not. It depends on your definition... if we're going by the purely textbook definition, then no, I've never actually [insert euphaism for "having sex" here]. But what about other sexual activity? I haven't done much mind you, but more than
nothing. Yes, she was someone really special.
I'm a passionate, physical person. It's why I hug with such enthusiasm. Therefore, it's not surprising that I wouldn't stick to the "save sex for marriage" philosophy. Sex is an expression of love, and therefore, if you really love someone, I don't think you need a piece of paper to tell you it's okay to go for it. Of course, marriage is more than a piece of paper, especially to a man of religion. I'm just saying that you don't need to be married to someone to be in love with them.
Edit: Also, Dia made a good point about experience. <p><div style="text-align:center">
</div></p>
Edited by: [url=http://pub30.ezboard.com/brpgww60462.showUserPublicProfile?gid=brainwalker>BrainWalker</A] at: 10/5/03 5:02 pm